![]() ![]() ![]() So, from my experience (which is rather extensive). That was the end of my QuickReport re-writes to Rave. So, needless to say, I reverted to QuickReport and purchased the QuickReport PRO 4 to make sure I could stick with QR. I then replaced a simple "grid-dump" with Rave, only to find Rave took as much as 10 times as long to create the same dump. The Rave version took many minutes to complete (this was a master-detail, where I did all the preprocessing in SPs under SQL) using the SAME SPs to populate. I had an Invoicing report in QuickReport that would run in 30 seconds. When QuickReport was supplanted by Rave starting in D7, I figured I would migrate to Rave. ![]() I have commercial software that has a significant amount of reporting involved. Perhaps some people will find it acceptable, but when you are generating 10's or 100's or reports at a time, with 100's or 1000's of pages total, the speed difference is VERY noticable. Rave is especially poor speed at master-details, but it is also much slower at just simple dumps. It hasn't mattered which type of report I create in Rave, it is always consistently slower than its counterpart in QR.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |